BELLINGHAM CIVIC
Meetings & Decisions
Budget & Finances
Budget · Full data set

Every number behind the budget story

The Budget Story covers the four questions residents ask first. This page holds everything else — 11 sections, each a full section of real charts and tables, not a quick preview. Pick a topic below, or scroll straight through.

Choose what to explore

General Fund spending by department, FY2015–FY2026. FY2026 actual was $129.0M up from $102.3M in FY2015 — figures are nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation or population growth.

FY2026 spending by department

No department-level breakdown on file for the latest year yet.

Total General Fund spending, FY2015–FY2026

FY15: $102.3MFY16: $82.4MFY17: $90.2MFY18: $106.1MFY19: $103.8MFY20: $108.3MFY21: $109.4MFY22: $119.8MFY23: $150.2MFY24: $164.8MFY25: $122.2MFY26: $129.0MFY15FY17FY19FY21FY23FY25FY26

Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (audited actuals) and the adopted/proposed budget for years without an audit yet.

Budget vs. Actual

Back to index ↑

FY2024 actual spending came in — (—) above the adopted budget. Department-level variance below, largest first.

DepartmentAdopted budgetActualVariance
Public safety—$75.9M+—
Cultural and recreation—$27.9M+—
General government—$19.1M+—
Transportation—$14.8M+—
Natural and economic environment—$7.8M+—
Lease SBITA PPP outlay—$1.4M+—
Social services—$0.9M+—
Debt service - Principal—$0.4M+—
Debt service - Interest and related charges—$0.1M+—

Source: FY2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, budgetary comparison schedule.

Compensation

Back to index ↑

Total city compensation (wages + benefits) reached $0.0M in calendar year 2023 across 1280 employees, up from $0.0M in 2023. Overtime was 6.6% of wages city-wide — but Fire alone ran 14.4% overtime in 2023, above every other department.

Total compensation by year

2023: $0.0M2023

Top departments by total compensation, 2023

No department-level breakdown on file for the latest year yet.

Source: State Controller’s Office Government Compensation in California database. Calendar years don't align exactly with the city's July–June fiscal year, so these figures shouldn't be compared directly to the ACFR spending figures above.

Fund Balance

Back to index ↑

The General Fund closed FY2024 with $133.2M in total fund balance. Reserves stood at 4.8 months of spending — a “green” level, though the trend has been declining. Unassigned balance — money with no earmark — is shown separately below; most of what's held is often assigned to specific future uses, not freely available.

FY2024 balance composition

  • Assigned15.8%
  • Nonspendable0.0%
  • Committed5.9%
  • Unassigned28.0%

Unassigned balance, FY2015–FY2024

FY15: $20.1MFY16: $22.6MFY17: $25.4MFY18: $32.2MFY19: $38.7MFY20: $39.7MFY21: $47.0MFY22: $47.6MFY23: $39.3MFY24: $37.3MFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, governmental funds balance sheet.

Pension Obligations

Back to index ↑

The tread water threshold is the minimum annual contribution that keeps the unfunded pension liability from growing — normal cost plus interest on the existing shortfall. Paying below it means the liability grows even while payments are being made. In 0 of the last 0 years, contributions to the Miscellaneous plan fell short of tread water; the Safety plan fell short in 0 of 0 years. Combined net pension liability reached -$32.6M as of FY2024.

Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, net pension liability by plan.

Structural Balance

Back to index ↑

Structural balance measures whether recurring revenues cover recurring expenditures — set aside one-time items like asset sales, capital spending, or inter-fund transfers. A surplus means ongoing operations are self-sustaining; a deficit means the city is using one-time money to fund ongoing services. FY2024 closed with a structural surplus of $14.7M (9.0% of recurring revenue). 0 of the last 10 years closed with a structural deficit.

Recurring revenue minus recurring expenditure, FY2015–FY2024

FY15: $22.3MFY16: $19.7MFY17: $20.6MFY18: $32.8MFY19: $22.7MFY20: $18.6MFY21: $33.9MFY22: $16.8MFY23: $4.4MFY24: $14.7MFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

A structural surplus can coexist with a falling fund balance — that happens when the balance decline comes from inter-fund transfers (a financing decision) rather than weaker operations. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports.

Net Position

Back to index ↑

Net position is the government-wide equivalent of net worth — total assets minus total liabilities, including long-term obligations like pensions, OPEB, and bonded debt that don't appear in the General Fund figures above. Total net position was $683.7M at the end of FY2024, up $26.6M for the year. Of that total, unrestricted position was a deficit of $10.1M — a common condition for cities carrying significant pension liabilities when negative.

Composition, FY2024 (excludes unrestricted)

  • Net investment in capital assets66.7%
  • Restricted34.8%

Total net position, FY2015–FY2024

FY15: $429.6MFY16: $449.5MFY17: $478.2MFY18: $495.8MFY19: $545.8MFY20: $554.8MFY21: $612.6MFY22: $643.7MFY23: $656.1MFY24: $683.7MFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

Government-wide figures use full accrual accounting (GASB 34) and differ from the General Fund fund-balance figures above, which use modified accrual accounting and exclude long-term liabilities. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, statement of net position.

Revenue Volatility

Back to index ↑

Coefficient of variation (CoV) measures year-to-year swings as a share of the average — higher means less predictable, and a volatile source needs bigger reserves to absorb a down year. The bigger risk sits in Sales and use taxes: it grew from $22.3M to $37.7M over this window — a large, now-load-bearing revenue source worth watching.

Volatility ranking

  1. Investment incomeCoV 339%
  2. Admissions taxesCoV 50%
  3. Fines and penaltiesCoV 45%
  4. Miscellaneous revenuesCoV 32%
  5. Intergovernmental revenueCoV 26%
  6. Charges for servicesCoV 24%
  7. Sales and use taxesCoV 18%
  8. Real estate excise taxesCoV 18%
  9. IntergovernmentalCoV 17%
  10. Property taxesCoV 12%
  11. Business taxesCoV 11%
  12. Licenses and permitsCoV 8%
  13. MiscellaneousCoV 7%
  14. Leasehold taxesCoV 4%
  15. Other taxesCoV 4%

CoV computed across all years on file. Transfers excluded — they’re financing activity, not operating revenue. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, governmental funds revenue detail.

All-Funds Overview

Back to index ↑

Not enough data on file yet for this section.

The city carries $868.9M in net book value of capital assets — infrastructure, buildings, land, and equipment, net of depreciation — as of FY2024.

Net book value by category, FY2024

  1. Improvements Other Than Buildings$436.0M
  2. Land$159.8M
  3. Buildings$118.8M
  4. Intangibles - Right of Ways$60.6M
  5. Construction in Progress$47.7M
  6. Machinery and Equipment$23.8M
  7. Improvements (non-depreciable)$17.6M
  8. Intangibles - Leases$3.5M
  9. Intangibles - Software$0.5M
  10. Intangibles - IT Subscription$0.5M

Capital improvement plan, by category

No capital improvement plan on file yet.

Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Report capital asset schedules; adopted Capital Improvement Program.

Finance Decoder

Back to index ↑

Seven fiscal-health indicators based on the Strong Towns Finance Decoder methodology, computed from government-wide (governmental activities) data in the ACFRs. The composite read for FY2024 is green, with a declining multi-year trend on net financial position — it peaked at $182.4M in FY2023.

Net financial position, FY2015–FY2024

FY15: $54.5MFY16: $67.4MFY17: $96.9MFY19: $126.6MFY20: $130.7MFY21: $180.0MFY22: $180.9MFY23: $182.4MFY24: $161.8MFY15FY16FY17FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

Net Financial Position

$161.8M

Liquid assets minus total liabilities. Negative means obligations exceed financial assets — the city is relying on future revenues to cover past bills.

Financial Assets-to-Liabilities

1.76×

Liquid assets ÷ total liabilities. Below 1.0 means the city cannot pay off its obligations with financial assets alone.

Assets-to-Liabilities

4.07×

Total assets (including infrastructure) ÷ total liabilities. Below 1.0 = insolvent; above 1.0 = owns more than it owes.

Net Debt-to-Total Revenues

0.00×

Years of revenue needed to pay off net debt. Zero means no net debt. A rising trend would signal growing unsustainability.

Interest-to-Total Revenues

0.9%

Share of revenue consumed by interest payments. Rising = past borrowing crowding out current services.

Net Book-to-Cost of Capital Assets

0.54×

Current value ÷ original cost of infrastructure. A declining trend signals aging assets and deferred maintenance.

Government Transfers-to-Total Revenues

21.2%

Share of revenue from state/federal aid. Rising = more exposure to funding decisions outside local control.

Based on the Strong Towns Finance Decoder. Source data is governmental activities only. Some years pending ACFR backfill.